I'm not sure if recent announcement by the league authority that they are on a look out for a new man in charge of the league did actually set a buzz in the local football community, which is of late swayed with number of things that taken place of late such as the joint FAS-FAM MOU and the Lions' making it to group stages qualifiers of the World Cup.
Nonetheless, I think as someone who is concerning about the future of Singapore football (even though, someone actually claimed I'm a 'killer' of it) I would like to share my thoughts here by using a case study not related to football from the past to the search for the new League boss.
With the title suggested "We need a "BIRCH" or "LOW" for our new CEO?" had therefore bring us to the main characters of this entry - JWW Birch and Hugh Low.
The two gentlemen in BOLD were instrumental in the British Residential System during the Colonial times in the 19th century.
|A skectch of JWW Birch (obtained via Resam Melayu )|
Despite being the administrative old hand for having served Ceylon prior to his appointment to his new role, Birch was portrayed as a "impatient man, insensitive to local cultures and wanted to have things changed quickly"
Which was because of his impatient and lack of tact over several issues that that eventually led to his assassination by a native chief in November 1875.
Sir Hugh Low
|Portrait of Hugh Low (obtained via Wikipedia)|
Many factors attributed the success of Low, for one thing he was a tactful person and emphasised on the "consultative" way to work with the native chief and the ruler of the state which eventually won him the trust from them.
Therefore, during his term in office Low was eventually phrased out some of the old practices that were hogging the development of the state, and by the time he retired from office in 1889 he transformed Perak from a state of anarchy to a model to be emulated by the rest of Malay States under this "Residential System".
(P.S: I will not dwell on what was written above-mentioned, as it's not the objective of this entry and I will express no opinions on those incidents either and what written above are formulated based on what I read from sources available source1, sourece2, source3, source4, source5)
As we can see from the brief insights on both characters that Birch is seen as someone who was impatient and gung-ho man to impose his thoughts without taking consideration of those he worked with, whereas Low was more of an accommodating person and ready to listen and work out a solution to every problem he was facing.
Without going into further details of what are the problems we are facing nowadays which we are so familiar with, I would liken the present situation in local football that bears some resemblance of that faced by both Birch and Low in the late 19th century.
That's why I believe (and HOPE) with the wisdom of the selection panel, they would have taken into account all the factors that are deemed critical in getting the RIGHT person to run the show.
Would they want someone like Birch whose abrasive style of wanting to impose changes quickly to rid those nagging problems in a huff OR are we, the fans, willing to brace for another few more years before we see the harvesting of the crops if someone like Low is the patient cultivator?